Okay, been beavering away on a new book, the working title of which is 'Tesla vs The Martians'. It's a stretched version of the short story 'Alternate Currents' included in the recent anthology 'Dark Currents' publish by NewCon Press and deals, as the title suggests, with how Nikola Tesla (the unbergenius who gave us electric power generation) battles it out with some Martian nasties trying to take over the world. I've shifted the action to Russia of 1906, the time of the first Revolution, the Duma, Marxist revolutionaries and enormous social upheavals, so it's a perfect setting for a writer. Meshing history with my SF fantasy was a little tricky, but in the end I only had to take one liberty with the timeline so I'm quite chuffed about that.
All-in-all I'm pretty pleased with it but now comes the difficult bit: polishing it into a readable story. A couple of the characters I've got to make a little more extreme and I want to push up the gore count but Tesla (who was a real wack-a-doodle anyway) sits really well in all this made-up mayhem.
Monday, 16 April 2012
Wednesday, 4 April 2012
TITLES
My American publishers are considering using a series title for the Demi-Monde books and using 'The Demi-Monde: Winter' etc as the title that demarks the individual books in the series.
So ... the names I've come up with are ... any suggestions/preferences/comments welcome!:
CounterFate (a play on counterfeit)
UnderLand (a play in Wonder Land)
And then there's the simply random
CyberDeath
Dupes
So ... the names I've come up with are ... any suggestions/preferences/comments welcome!:
CounterFate (a play on counterfeit)
Adventures in a CounterFate World
The CounterFate Wars
Must we Die in a CounterFate World?
Adventures in an CounterFate World
Of course you could substitute CounterFate with ReBorn;
ReDieUnderLand (a play in Wonder Land)
Ella’s Adventures in UnderLand
MisAdventures in UnderLand
Shadows
The Shadow Wars
The War of Shadows
ShadowLand Wars
Beware the Shadow Stalkers
Those Inspired by Jose Farmer and Philip K. Dick
Who Will Dry My cyberTears
Prey … for I am made dust.
Swathe me in Shadows
Adventures in a ParaHell Universe
Into the Vortex I Freely Tumble
Rise of the Dark Charismatics
And then there's the simply random
Abandon Hope
The CyberBloc Wars
CyberBloc Girls
The Girls in the CyberBloc
ConflictionCyberDeath
CyberKnell
DieVilleDupes
NeverEverLand
TerrorVille
Ella vs The Singularities
Soul Cage
Split Infinities
The Ghosts in the Machine
ReDie
Wednesday, 28 March 2012
CALLING ALL MARXIST-LENINISTS
Well into the first of the post Demi-Monde books. Most of the action will take place in St Petersburg of 1906 and those history buffs amongst you will remember that this is when things really began to kick-off in Russia. 1905/1906 has been called 'the dress-rehearsal' for the revolution of 1917.
In the scene I'm currently writing my hero (called Samuel) and heroine (called Jemilah) are attending a meeting of the Social Democrats (revolutionary socialists) where one Comrade Lenin is orating. Therefore I needed to concoct a speech that was suitably 'Lenin-esque'. Now never having had much time for politics (or politicians) this is new territory for me so any of you who have expertise in this area, please feel free to critique it as hard as you like. All comments welcome! Here it is ...
In the scene I'm currently writing my hero (called Samuel) and heroine (called Jemilah) are attending a meeting of the Social Democrats (revolutionary socialists) where one Comrade Lenin is orating. Therefore I needed to concoct a speech that was suitably 'Lenin-esque'. Now never having had much time for politics (or politicians) this is new territory for me so any of you who have expertise in this area, please feel free to critique it as hard as you like. All comments welcome! Here it is ...
The
admiration in Samuel’s voice made Jemilah a little uncomfortable: she had a
natural suspicion of ‘great men’ and their motives. They edged closer and now
she could make out what Lenin was saying.
‘…
told that terrorism is not a legitimate means of class struggle. We are told
that we must eschew robbery as a means of financing the revolution. We are told
that anarchism demoralises the workers, alienates wide swathes of the
population and injures the revolution. We are told we must remain quiescent.
This is wrong! We must not expect the triumph of the proletariat to be served
to us on a plate. In the whole of history there is not one example of the class
struggle being resolved without violence. When violence is exercised by the
working people, by the mass of the exploited against the exploiters – then we,
the Bolsheviks, are for it.’
There
were cheers around the hall, cheers which also provoked boos. This Lenin, it
seemed, was something of a divisive figure in revolutionary circles. But he was a powerful speaker; that much
Jemilah had to admit. She glanced towards Samuel who seemed to be quite
entranced by the man.
When
the room had quietened Lenin resumed his oration. ‘That is what the struggle of
our brave Comrades in Moscow taught us when they manned the barricades and took
control of the streets: that as the revolution progresses it will stimulate a
strong and united counter-revolution.
The criminal Tsar will be compelled to resort to more and more extreme measures
to defend his illegal and immoral regime: has he not been forced to declare
martial law over much of the country, has he not had to mobilise regiments of
fresh troops, has he not connived in the despicable pogroms perpetrated by the
Black Hundred and has he not used military courts to execute protestors without
a fair trial?
More
cheers; anti-Tsar rhetoric was obviously popular. ‘We socialists must recognise
this mass terror and we must resist it. And that will necessitate the embracing
of violence. It is inevitable that the Russian proletariat will have to resort
to the same method of struggle as was used in the Paris Commune – civil war. We
would be deceiving both ourselves and the people if we concealed the fact that
the overthrow of the bourgeoisie will necessitate a desperate, bloody war of
extermination. Those of you who are opposed to it, those of you who do not
prepare for it, are traitors to the proletariat, are traitors to the
revolution.’
Provocative little bastard, decided Jemilah, and obviously
a born rabble-rouser.
‘We
must show no mercy to these enemies of the people, the enemies of socialism, the
enemies of the working people. War to the death against the rich and their
hangers-on, the bourgeois intellectuals!’
Lenin’s
appetite for blood and slaughter was obviously contagious. The crowd began to
shout and yell its support.
‘Only
by violent disorganisation will we seize the attention of the downtrodden,
giving them hope whilst simultaneously creating fear in the heart of the
oppressors.’
‘Terrorism
is wrong!’ shouted a doubter from the side of the room. ‘Anarchy is wrong!
‘No,
Comrade,’ Lenin shouted back, ‘it is you who is wrong! The armed struggle to
secure the victory of the proletariat legitimises the assassination of the
leaders of the bourgeoisie and the confiscation of funds by robbery. It is not
these guerrilla actions which disorganises the revolutionary movement but rather
it is the weakness of a Party which is incapable of taking such actions under
its control. It is not guerrilla war which demoralises but unorganised,
irregular, non-party guerrilla acts. The very act of violent political
disorganisation imbues it with ideological credence. It is time we all accepted
that nothing can be done in this country except by putsches. We are
revolutionaries who have dedicated our lives to the cause of socialism and the
freeing of the proletariat and the peasants from bondage so we must stand ready
to sacrifice our lives for the cause: to triumph we must kill and, if
necessary, die!’
‘What
about the Duma?’ This, to Jemilah’s surprise, was a question shouted by Samuel.
‘Ah
… the Duma … the very fact that you have asked the question, Comrade, shows how
our revolutionary certainty has been obscured by the debate regarding the Duma,
how successful this ploy of the Tsar has been in confusing and distracting the
revolutionary energies of the people.’ He paused for a moment in sad
reflection. ‘We are told by the liberals that the success of the political
struggle against the government can only be secured by the consolidation and
expansion of the rights of the Duma. What nonsense! We all know that the Duma is
a miserable travesty of popular representation. This fraud must be exposed and this
we can do only by boycotting the Duma … but it must be an active boycott … a boycott accompanied by intense agitation in
order to provoke an intense political crisis.’
For
several long seconds Lenin stood silent on the stage. Then, ‘It is time,
Comrades, to grasp the nettle. It is time we recognise that only by a campaign
of brutal and ferocious disorganisation and an espousal of agitational
pragmatism will we free the people of the autocracy lauded over by that
embodiment of despotism, Tsar Nicholas II.’ Again he paused, ‘Comrades, we are
met at a cross-roads of history: do we take the fork signalled by the Kadets
and signposted ‘Passivity and Submission’ or the fork signalled by the
Bolsheviks and signposted ‘Action and Terror’? Are we to remain supine in the
face of judicial murder or are we to smash and pulverise our opponents into
submission? I say to you: down with the Dumtsy!’
Calling
the Duma representatives by the diminutive ‘dumtsy’
raised a laugh.
‘Down
with this new police fraud! Honour the memory of the fallen heroes of the Moscow
barricades by making fresh preparations for an armed uprising! Long live the
revolution!’
There
was wild cheering and as though carried away by the audience’s enthusiasm Lenin
began to pace the stage. ‘And let us all hope, Comrades, that by such acts of
selflessness and sacrifice we will create the longed for popular rising of the
people. It is my hope that from such a rising will emerge an ambitious man of
genius, a Caesar, a demigod, who will lead our benighted country out of the
darkness of autocracy and to whom all men and women will bow their heads as
equals.’
Wednesday, 14 March 2012
VIRGINMEDIA IS SHIT
Do NOT use VirginMedia … this is my sorry saga.
I moved house on the 28th February and decided
(foolishly) to ditch BT and go to Virgin as my telephone and broadband
supplier. They arrived on the 8th March and connected me. On the 9th
I ‘phoned to enquire if they did a special rate deal for calls to Russia (Nelli
my wife is Russian and likes to chat with relatives and friends). They did –
for £2.00 a month they would take my call rate down from £1.00 per minute to
10p per minute. Yippee!
So all was well until yesterday evening when at 6.30 p.m. I
get a call from Virgin (I didn’t take the girl’s name) who informed me that in
the past week I’d spent £250 on international calls. Now at 10p per minute that
works out at a little under 42 hours worth of calls and whilst Nelli might like
talking to Russia but she doesn’t talk that much. I suggested to Miss X that
the preferential call rate hadn’t been put through. ‘Oh yes,’ she said, ‘but to
put the changes thru you’ll have to speak to the ‘Debt Collection Department’
(Debt Collection?). I’ll put you thru.’
TIME SPENT ON THE ‘PHONE TO MISS X: 37 MINUTES
Eventually I get thru to ‘Daniel’ who seems to know nothing
and who eventually admits that he’ll have to refer my problem to his manager ‘Kirsty
Aitchison’ who will ‘phone me ‘definitely before 9.00 p.m.’ to resolve the
situation.
TIME SPENT ON THE ‘PHONE TO DANIEL: 35 MINUTES
‘Kirsty Aitchison’ doesn’t call.
At 8.30 a.m. I call VirginMedia and am put thru to ‘Joanne’.
After a lot of toing and froing we establish that maybe, perhaps I have been
credited with the overcharges made. But when I ask for a statement this induces
meltdown.
TIME SPENT ON THE ‘PHONE TO JOANNE: 40 MINUTES
I am transferred to ‘Andrew’ in Technical Support who
explains to me that VirginMedia is so cutting edge that they don’t do
statements, they do ‘on-screen billing information’. With Andre’s help I go to
the VirginMedia website. I have difficulty logging on because no one seems to
know the e-mail address my log-on details demand. Eventually I penetrate and am
faced by an announcement that ‘no billing information is available’. Andrew
scratches his head and says he will flag a problem and will get back to me.
TIME SPENT ON THE ‘PHONE TO ANDREW: 28 MINUTES
I ask to be transferred to someone who can tell me how to
cancel my VirginMedia account. I eventually speak to ‘Rachel’. After much
huffing and puffing – and Rachel gets very exasperated that I don’t understand
Virgin-speak – I understand that:
·
I can’t see my billing information because it is
only posted monthly, and,
·
It will cost me £45 to leave Virgin.
TIME ONE THE ‘PHONE TO RACHEL: 25 MINUTES
I receive 3 identical text messages from Virgin telling me
everything will be sorted in ’48 hours’.
In sum I spent nearly 3 hours (3-fucking-hours!)
on the ‘phone sorting out something which WASN’T MY FAULT. Virgin screwed up
and I had to waste my time unscrewing it. I’m shifting to BT!
Sunday, 26 February 2012
SUMMER END PAGES
The final sstep before 'The Demi-Monde: SUmmer' is put to bed is to provide the artwork for the endpages - that's the inside of the covers. Those of you familiar with the hardbacks of Spring and Summer might recall that these showed blueprints of, respectively, a steamer and a Zeppelin, but as most of the action of Summer takes place in the Coven - the Sino-Japanese sector of the DM - Nigel Robinson (who does the DM artwork) came up with a WarJunk, the 'blueprint' done Chinese style.
This is a representation of the ship that the Coven use to fight the ForthRight's Monitors, the inspiration being the Battle of Hampton Roads during the Covil War in America when the USS Monitor fought the CSS Virginia. Unfortunately I become TOO focussed on this and I missed a trick: in the book I refer to the Coven's ships as IronClads - the name that Nigel came up with, 'WarJunk', is so much better. Ah me.
This is a representation of the ship that the Coven use to fight the ForthRight's Monitors, the inspiration being the Battle of Hampton Roads during the Covil War in America when the USS Monitor fought the CSS Virginia. Unfortunately I become TOO focussed on this and I missed a trick: in the book I refer to the Coven's ships as IronClads - the name that Nigel came up with, 'WarJunk', is so much better. Ah me.
MOVING HOUSE
I've been very delinquent regarding my blog during February and the reason is that Nelli and I have been looking for a new house. We only came to Derby so that Kit and Ellie could take up the scholarships they won at Repton and we've never really settled here. So when the kids went off to university we decided to decamp to somewhere within better striking distance of Oxford and London. After a few false-starts we've plumped for a house in Daventry which is only 70 miles from London. It's a small town but with good amenities so I think we'll be fine there. The house we've chosen is pretty unprepossessing from the outside - bunkeresque - but inside it's really very nice indeed all open plan and split level.
All-in-all I'm looking forward to the move - especially as there seems to be a very active writers group in the area!
| Chez Rees |
All-in-all I'm looking forward to the move - especially as there seems to be a very active writers group in the area!
Tuesday, 31 January 2012
REMINDS ME OF DECO IN THE COMMITMENTS
Considering that the last week has been pretty hellish (pounding around the Midlands looking for a new house and being reminded that most houses are awful) it was quite nice to open up the internet today and find two great reviews of 'Winter' waiting for me.
The first was from 'The Trades' (http://www.the-trades.com/article.php?id=12880) written by R.J.Carter who describes Winter as 'part political satire, part steampunk, part cyberpunk and all parts downhill slalom race ... a ripper of a novel'. A great way to start the day.
The second was from the Lexinton Examiner (http://www.examiner.com/literature-in-lexington/demi-monde-winter-picks-up-where-michael-crichton-left-off-review) written by Jesse Coffey who gave a glowing review but then went a little further by suggesting that I might be the man to fill Michael Crichton's shoes! A trifle embarrassing. Crichton was a brilliant, brilliant writer who came up with some utterly amazing scenarios and storylines ... if I ever get half that inventive I'll be bloody delighted.
But reading Jesse's review reminded me of the great line from 'The Commitments' (a masterpiece of a film by Alan Parker) when Deco (the singer in the band) is told that he'll be jamming with Wilson Pickett. The line goes: 'Deco Cuffe and Wilson Pickett ... together at last!'
Trouble is that Deco and Wilson never did get together ... but I suppose I can dream.
The first was from 'The Trades' (http://www.the-trades.com/article.php?id=12880) written by R.J.Carter who describes Winter as 'part political satire, part steampunk, part cyberpunk and all parts downhill slalom race ... a ripper of a novel'. A great way to start the day.
The second was from the Lexinton Examiner (http://www.examiner.com/literature-in-lexington/demi-monde-winter-picks-up-where-michael-crichton-left-off-review) written by Jesse Coffey who gave a glowing review but then went a little further by suggesting that I might be the man to fill Michael Crichton's shoes! A trifle embarrassing. Crichton was a brilliant, brilliant writer who came up with some utterly amazing scenarios and storylines ... if I ever get half that inventive I'll be bloody delighted.
But reading Jesse's review reminded me of the great line from 'The Commitments' (a masterpiece of a film by Alan Parker) when Deco (the singer in the band) is told that he'll be jamming with Wilson Pickett. The line goes: 'Deco Cuffe and Wilson Pickett ... together at last!'
Trouble is that Deco and Wilson never did get together ... but I suppose I can dream.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
